Legal Opinion

Carter v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 18, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit .Court, (Chancery Branch, First Division);

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll —

Reversing.

1 In 1906 the City of Louisville filed a suit against 'George Hoertz, seeking to subject certain real'estate in the city'of Louisville owned by him to the paymeilt of taxes' assessed in 1900 and due in 1901. "While this action was .pending, and in December, 1909, the appellant Óaftér purchased the property sought to" be subjected fropi Hoertz, without notice of the pendency of this suit. The city did not file in the clerk’s-office of the county .court the notice of the pendency of the suit as provided for in section" 2358a of' the Kentucky…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trapp's Admr. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API