Legal Opinion

Fruitman v. Bregman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 3, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConroy, J.

Upon the foregoing papers tMs motion by the defendant for leave to amend his answer is denied. Subdivision 3 of section 270 of the Tax Law, as amended by chapter 141 of the Laws of 1945, now provides it shall be the duty of the person or persons making or effectuating the sale of stock to pay the tax and includes the person to whom the sale is made. The defendant cannot avail himself of the defense that the plaintiff has not paid the tax when the law as it is now constituted imposes an equal liability for such payment upon him. In this case there is also the further question of waiver and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bean v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Boag v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Attridge v. PembrokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Cooper v. GossettNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Wylie v. AddomsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaeffer v. LerchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API