People v. Diamond
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtJulian A. Hertz, J.
The circumstances of defendant’s arrest, as disclosed at the preliminary hearing, led this court to grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss a charge that he had violated section 265.05 of the Penal Law. The Assistant District Attorney did not oppose the defendant’s motion. It was clear that the knife found in defendant’s possession was neither a per se weapon nor was there any evidence of a design on defendant’s part to use the knife unlawfully.
There now remains for disposition an alleged violation of section. 190.25 of the Penal Law, charging criminal impersonation.
The facts disclose that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Irene Ethel Vinyard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- People v. LauricellaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961
- People ex rel. Harris v. MallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GolbNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Breitkopf v. GentileDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- People v. ShermanRochester City Court · 1982
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.