Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Kirkwood

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1986No. 16413Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

I write to express my disappointment with the majority who today sanctions the inadequate handling of the record by a trial judge. Instead of criticizing the trial court for not ruling on the record on a critical motion to suppress, four members of this Court go to great lengths to show that the defendant somehow waived his Fifth Amendment right not to be convicted on the basis of potentially coerced confessions.

First, a word about our relationship with the state’s Court of Appeals is in order. This appeal was first heard by that court, State v. Kirkwood, 110 Idaho 97, 714 P.2d 66…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. LePageIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sheets v. Agro-West, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. CariagaIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API