Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Solitron Devices, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 11, 1968No. 263, Docket 31119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm in open court the order of the Southern District denying a motion by Order to Show Cause by Solitron Devices, Inc., for an order directing plaintiff in a stockholder derivative action alleging violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to post security for expenses pursuant to Section 627 of the New York Business Corporation Law, McKinneys’s Consol.Laws, c. 4, for the reasons stated in Judge Bonsai’s opinion. Weitzen v. Kearns, 262 F.Supp. 931 (S.D.N.Y.1966).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weitzen v. KearnsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harold DRACHMAN and Claire Drachman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lawrence A. HARVEY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Harold DRACHMAN and Claire Drachman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lawrence A. HARVEY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972