Legal Opinion

Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 4, 1906No. 63PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs assignors, hereinafter called the plaintiff, under the name of the estate of John J. Bagley, were the owners of certain land and a building thereon in the city of Detroit, in the state'of Michigan. The defendant was a New York corporation, engaged in the business of manufacturing and installing automatic sprinklers. In May, 1896, the parties entered into a contract, which was as follows:

“General Fire Extinguisher Company.
“Chicago, Ill.', April 20, 1890.

‘•Proposal for equipping the property of estate of J. J. Bagley building, 19 to 33 Lamed St., Detroit,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Linseed Oil Co. v. A. F. Buchanan & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Somerville v. Gullett Gin Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Hopkinsville Motor Company v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Burley v. Compagnie de Navigation FrancaiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API