Legal Opinion

Herman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered April 26, 1996, which denied petitioner landlord’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination of a rent overcharge and imposing treble damages, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Record support and a rational basis exist for respondent’s findings that petitioner failed to produce a credible rent history despite ample opportunity to do so, justifying use of the default formula for establishing the legal regulated rent (Matter of 61 Jane St. Assocs. v New York…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Century Tower Associates v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunbar Partners v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API