Legal Opinion

George Alexander Mills and Houdry Process Corp. v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 19, 1955No. 12472_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a patent case under Rev.Stat. § 4915 (1875). 1 The District Court denied relief, and this appeal followed.

Plaintiffs-appellants say that their invention lies “in the discovery of a particular and unique kaolin clay,” which proved unusually successful as a catalyst in the so-called “catalytic cracking process” for making gasoline. But it is clear that the clay in question — described as “Eureka halloysite” 2 — was already known and available for purchase in the market. What was discovered was that this clay had certain desirable properties not previously realized. The question is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vanadium Corp. Of America v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leesona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Everlube Corp. of America v. Electrofilm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1957
  3. Leesona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Beck v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API