George Alexander Mills and Houdry Process Corp. v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
This is a patent case under Rev.Stat. § 4915 (1875). 1 The District Court denied relief, and this appeal followed.
Plaintiffs-appellants say that their invention lies “in the discovery of a particular and unique kaolin clay,” which proved unusually successful as a catalyst in the so-called “catalytic cracking process” for making gasoline. But it is clear that the clay in question — described as “Eureka halloysite” 2 — was already known and available for purchase in the market. What was discovered was that this clay had certain desirable properties not previously realized. The question is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vanadium Corp. Of America v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leesona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Everlube Corp. of America v. Electrofilm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1957
- Leesona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Beck v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958