Legal Opinion

State v. Rudman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 8, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

The respondent was convicted of attempted abortion in violation of P. L. 1921, Chap. 153. Exception was taken to the admission of a hypothetical question propounded by the State, as also to the refusal of the presiding Judge to direct a verdict for the respondent. After verdict of guilty, the respondent seasonably filed a motion in arrest of judgment which was overruled and further exception reserved.

In view of the issues raised .by the exceptions and in argument of counsel, we find it necessary to depart from the order in which the exceptions were reserved and direct our consideration first…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Beasley v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. State v. MeekSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Bassett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tileston v. UllmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Hans v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  4. Crichton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  5. State v. ColmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API