Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*837The Supreme Court’s determination, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, to assess the defendant 20 points for risk factor 6 was supported by clear and convincing evidence based, inter alia, on facts contained in the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders and the risk assessment instrument (see People v Wiedeman, 51 AD3d 888, 888-889 [2008]). The case summary establishes by clear and convincing evidence that, immediately preceding the sexual assault, the victim was choked until she fell to the floor, stopped moving, and was in and out of consciousness during the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BatteaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. CabanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. HuurreNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. CecunjaninNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. HyamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API