Peebles v. Sneed
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentHolt, J.
The essential facts appear not to be in dispute. Tbe question is tbe correct application of the law to these facts. Appellant’s contract of employment is evidenced by tbe letters set out in tbe majority opinion. Tbe construction to be placed upon this contract is for tbe court.
“Tbe terms of tbe contract of sale were evidenced by tbe letters and telegrams, and it was tbe duty of tbe court to construe tbe contract and declare its terms to tbe jury.” McDonough v. Williams, 77 Ark. 261, 92 S. W. 783, 8 L. R. A., N. S. 452, 7 Ann. Cas. 276. “This court is committed to tbe rule that contracts' may…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Scott v. Patterson & ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Stiewel v. LallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Pinkerton v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Hunton v. MarshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.