Legal Opinion

First West Side Bank v. Hiddleston

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1987No. 85-593PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff bank to enforce a personal guaranty agreement executed by the defendants in connection with credit extended to a business. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants, and the bank has appealed.

On appeal the plaintiff assigns the following errors: that the court erred in giving certain instructions to the jury, which instructions included statements contrary to law; that the court erred in failing to give certain instructions to the jury that were requested by the plaintiff, which instructions accurately reflected applicable law; and that the court erred…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maloney v. KaminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co. v. GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Fuel Exploration, Inc. v. NovotnyNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bourke v. WattsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hennis v. O'CONNORNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McCune v. NeitzelNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. LenzNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Carnes v. WeesnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Palmtag v. Gartner Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. BERGMAN BY HARRE v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API