Legal Opinion
In Re Sullivan
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1984No. 1-19-40606PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
C. ALBERT PARENTE, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the court on the objection of Robin Lazar (“Lazar”) to the confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan proposed by Dennis J. Sullivan (“debtor”). La-zar, debtor’s former wife, objects to the confirmation of debtor’s plan on the ground that the plan does not comply with 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3) which requires that the plan be proposed in “good faith.” Alternatively, Lazar seeks a determination that the debt owed to her is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a)(2) and 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The debtor, Dennis J.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- In Re Mary E. Johnson, Debtor. Mary E. Johnson v. Vanguard Holding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- First National City Bank of New York v. Internal Revenue Service of United States Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nelson v. Easley (In Re Easley)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987
- In Re GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1985
- State Education Assistance Authority v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2001