Legal Opinion

Moniz v. National Constructors, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiffs seek to review and reduce the costs which were taxed against them in this action. Pending the original trial and the ultimate judgment for defendant on a later trial the Legislature amended the law regulating the amount of recoverable costs in an action, substantially increasing them. Plaintiffs took the position that costs should be taxed at the amount in effect when their action was begun. They have, however, since conceded that they were wrong in that respect and have withdrawn that objection, leaving in dispute the question only of whether the successful defendant is entitled…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Downing v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Hamilton v. ButlerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1865
  3. Lennon v. MacIntoshCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887
  4. Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Wessels v. CarrCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Selby Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Als, Inc.Rochester City Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API