June Medical Services L. L. C. v. Russo
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
I
A
In March 2014, five months after Texas' admitting-privileges requirement forced the closure of half of that State's abortion clinics, Louisiana's Legislature began to hold hearings to consider a substantially identical proposal. Compare Whole Woman's Health , 579 U. S., at ---- - ----, 136 S.Ct., at 2299-2300, with June Medical Services LLC v. Kliebert , 250 F.Supp.3d 27, 53 (MD La. 2017) ; Record 11220. The proposal became law in mid-June 2014. 2014 La. Acts p. 2330.
As was true in Texas, Louisiana law already required abortion providers either to possess local hospital admitting privileges…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- June Med Svcs v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Ass'n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. FDACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Anthony Daunt v. Jocelyn BensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Kelly Rhodes v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Lisa Folajtar v. Attorney General USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.