Legal Opinion
Philip Dix v. Total Petrochemicals USA Inc P
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 30, 2013No. 12-4585UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Philip A. Dix brought a putative class action against Appellee Total Petrochemicals USA, Inc., Pension Plan (the Plan) on June 23, 2010, alleging that the Plan violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) when it failed to include the present value of cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) in its lump sum calculations. The District Court determined that Dix’s claim was time-barred and entered summary judgment in favor of the Plan. We will affirm.
I
Because the District Court thoroughly described Dix’s pension plan, the documents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul Miller v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company and Resorts International HotelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Romero v. Allstate Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Roy GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Ortega Candelaria v. ORTHOBIOLOGICS LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Williams v. Rohm and Haas Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamrick v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Manning v. EIDP, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Mary J. Hamrick, David B. Beckley, and Valentin Rodriguez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. E.I]. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, the Administration Committee of the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan, and John/Jane Does 1-5; James M. Manning, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. EIDP, Inc. f/k/a E.1. du Pont de Nemours and Company, the Administration Committee of the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan and John/Jane Does 1-5District Court, D. Delaware · 2026