Legal Opinion

Stull v. Masilonka

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1905No. 13,858PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to the district court for Platte county: Conrad Hollenbeck, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, C.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse a judgment of the district court for Platte county. To insure a proper understanding of the issues involved, it seems necessary to make a detailed statement of the facts and conditions as they appear from the record. On December 5, 1894, Paul Masilonka borrowed of Stull Bros. $800. He gave his note secured by a real estate mortgage covering the west half of the northeast quarter of 18-19-2. A portion of the interest accruing on this loan was evidenced-by separate notes secured by a second mortgage. Paul Masilonka died intestate. Default was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merriam v. GoodlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Boden v. MierNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hall v. HooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Loney v. CourtnayNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Manfull v. GrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Butler v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Roberts v. Enderlin Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Wirtz v. GordonMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kaylor v. KelseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Duval v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API