Commonwealth v. Barnette
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
The question presented is whether defendant William Barnette voluntarily and intelligently waived bis constitutional right to the assistance of counsel during the jury selection stage of his trial. We hold that the record indicates no such waiver and accordingly remand for a new trial.
Petitioner William Barnette and another youth were arrested and charged with larceny and receiving stolen goods. Tn the jury selection proceedings of their joint trial the following colloquy took place:
“By Judge McDonald :
I think we should ask Mr. Barnett [sic] if he is agreeable to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. TylerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MonicaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BrazilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.