Legal Opinion

United States v. Erie Basin Metal Products Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 12, 1948No. Crim. 21312PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

The Court has decided to grant the motions of the four defendants for transfer, and will now give, in as much detail as appears to be appropriate, its reasons for so doing.

There are six defendants in this case, five individuals and one corporate defendant. All of them except two individuals, Henry M. Garsson and Murray W. Garsson, have moved for transfer of the proceeding with respect to each of them to the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, relying upon the provisions of Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Criminal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  2. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  3. Newton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. Hughes Tool Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1948
  5. Decker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. LurosDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1965
  2. General Cigar Co. Ex Rel. Home Insurance Co. v. Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1971
  3. United States v. ChoateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. James Norman Yeloushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. AldoupolisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API