Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1994No. 93-1079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Prior report: 8 F.3d 1113.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Edward CzuprynskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward M. CzuprynskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Edward M. CzuprynskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API