Legal Opinion

Pace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 17, 2000No. 4D00-1157Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the denial of the motion to correct illegal sentence filed by appellant Frank Pace, without prejudice to file a new motion for credit for time served, which satisfies the requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998) and Thomas v. State, 712 So.2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Affirmance is with prejudice on the remaining grounds.

WARNER, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998