Satanic Temple v. Scottsdale, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Satanic Temple, et al., No. CV18-00621-PHX-DGC 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER AND JUDGMENT 11 v. 12 City of Scottsdale, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiffs sought to give an invocation at a meeting of the Scottsdale City Council, 17 were ultimately denied, and now claim that the denial violated their rights under the 18 Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution. The Court 19 denied each side’s motion for summary judgment, finding a dispute of fact on the reasons 20 for the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.