Legal Opinion

Curry Industries v. Maringer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1997No. 96-2119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The judge of compensation claims (JCC) erred in including in claimant’s average weekly wage (AWW) the employer’s contributions to claimant’s pension and medicare benefits. As we explained in Vegas v. Globe Security, 627 So.2d 76, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (en bane), review denied, 637 So.2d 234 (Fla.1994), the amended definition of wages found in section 440.02(24), Florida Statutes (1993), sharply curtailed the fringe benefits that could be considered in calculating an employee’s AWW. Pension benefits, since the enactment of the amendment, are no longer included. Cable Vision of Cent. Fla. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vegas v. Globe SEC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Munroe Regional Medical Center v. RickerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. CABLE VISION OF CENTRAL FLA. v. ArmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Orange County School Board v. MuscanellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Running W. Citrus Ltd. Partnership v. RaggsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API