Legal Opinion

A. B. Farquhar Co. v. Higham

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Grand Forks County; Fisk, J. Action by' A. B. Farquhar Company, Limited, against W. H. Higham. From the judgment, both parties appeal. Where defendant, pursuant to contract, endorsed and delivered notes, he became primarily'liable at least as guarantor. Rev. Codes, 1899, sections 4625-2636; 7 Cyc. 967, Id. 664. Under the terms of the contract, a waiver was established. Eaton & Gilbert, Com. Paper 521, 529, 4 Enc. of Law, 453, 457; Randal on Com.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Grand Forks County; Fisk, J. Action by' A. B. Farquhar Company, Limited, against W. H. Higham. From the judgment, both parties appeal. Where defendant, pursuant to contract, endorsed and delivered notes, he became primarily'liable at least as guarantor. Rev. Codes, 1899, sections 4625-2636; 7 Cyc. 967, Id. 664. Under the terms of the contract, a waiver was established. Eaton & Gilbert, Com. Paper 521, 529, 4 Enc. of Law, 453, 457; Randal on Com. Paper, Chap. 38, section 2. Promise to pay interest waives presentment and notice. Eaton & Gilbert Com. Paper, 471. An…

1Opinion of the Court

Morgan. C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment by both parties. On plaintiff's appeal, the statement of the case was stricken from the files for reasons that are not material now. Defendant has appealed without settling a statement of case. The only question presented is, therefore, whether the findings of fact sustain the judgment. No question is made by the plaintiff that the findings do not sustain the judgment in its favor, and it is not claimed that a different judgment should have been rendered in its favor under the findings. The action was one involving an accounting, and the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Thompson v. CurryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Worley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Bank of Montpelier v. Montpelier Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. G. Sommers & Co. v. Tintah Co-Operative Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API