Legal Opinion

City of Arkansas City v. Kansas Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 14, 1995No. 72,516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

Kevin Vanderpool was employed by the City of Arkansas City (City) as a sanitation truck driver. He was fired from that job for refusing to complete a urine test for drugs. Vanderpool filed an application for unemployment benefits with the Kansas Department of Human Resources (KDHR). The City contested his application. An examiner for KDHR found that Vanderpool was not terminated for misconduct and granted him the requested benefits. This decision was appealed to a KDHR referee. The referee basically affirmed the decision of the examiner. The decision of the examiner was appealed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vakas v. Kansas Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. City of Wichita v. Employment Security BoardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  3. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pouncil v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  2. Kimberly A. Sparkman v. Burns Phillips, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Labor And Workforce Development, and First Tennessee Bank, N. A.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  3. Pouncil v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API