City of Arkansas City v. Kansas Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, J.:
Kevin Vanderpool was employed by the City of Arkansas City (City) as a sanitation truck driver. He was fired from that job for refusing to complete a urine test for drugs. Vanderpool filed an application for unemployment benefits with the Kansas Department of Human Resources (KDHR). The City contested his application. An examiner for KDHR found that Vanderpool was not terminated for misconduct and granted him the requested benefits. This decision was appealed to a KDHR referee. The referee basically affirmed the decision of the examiner. The decision of the examiner was appealed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vakas v. Kansas Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- City of Wichita v. Employment Security BoardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
- Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pouncil v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- Kimberly A. Sparkman v. Burns Phillips, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Labor And Workforce Development, and First Tennessee Bank, N. A.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
- Pouncil v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998