Legal Opinion

Ingwaldson v. Olson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1900No. Nos. 12,012-(102)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Clay county, Baxter, J., granting a motion to set aside a judgment against defendants Mary Olson and Mathea Olson.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This action was originally brought against Nils and Andrew Olson to recover for laborer’s wages incurred by defendants. The summons was served, no answer was interposed, and a default judgment for the amount claimed was duly entered in favor of plaintiff, who afterwards discovered that the appellants, Mary and Mathea Olson, were jointly indebted with the judgment debtors for the labor services which constitute the claim against Nils and Andrew Olson above referred to. The plaintiff then attempted to secure the benefit of the statute (G. S. 1894, § 5436) which provides that

“When a judgment is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. LoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sexton v. SutherlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Nolan v. McNameeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bennett v. DarlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API