Legal Opinion
Klein v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2008No. 06-55510PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We respectfully ask the Supreme Court of California to exercise its discretion to decide the certified question presented below, pursuant to California Rule of Court 8.548. The answer to this question of California law could be dispositive of the appeal before us, and no clear controlling California precedent exists. See id. Moreover, because the question we certify is of the utmost importance to both California landowners and recreational users of California lands, considerations of comity and federalism suggest that the highest court in California, rather than our…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lauro ACEVES, Jamie Aceves, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ornelas v. RandolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Ryman v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Klein v. United StatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Simson v. Burkart (In Re Simpson)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Fuqua v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Clifford Brace, Jr. v. Steven SpeierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Christopher Mendoza v. NordstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.