Legal Opinion

Schepps v. First Security National Bank of Beaumont

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1970No. 7183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, First Security National Bank of Beaumont, Texas, against defendants, Mair J. Schepps and Jack Rush, on a letter of guaranty. Trial was before the court and judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Most of defendants’ points of error attack the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the trial court. The parties will be referred to here as they were in the trial court or by name.

The evidence shows: Grady H. Marshall was engaged in the wholesale tobacco and candy business under the name “M & M Supply Company.” Early in 1964,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southland Royalty Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Terre Haute Cooperage, Inc. v. BranscomeMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Beckham v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Blount v. Westinghouse Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. McGhee v. Wynnewood State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Vahlco Corporation, and Frederick Henry Vahlsing, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Waller v. Missouri City State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. 19 Collier bankr.cas.2d 940, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,440 William R. Bartmann, Debtor-Appellant v. Maverick Tube Corporation and Nucorp Supply, Inc., Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API