Legal Opinion

Mal Newberg v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 21, 1961No. 18-1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm on the reasoned opinion of Judge Metzner below, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 187 F.Supp. 158. As he shows, while failure •of the government to file a tax claim against a bankrupt estate will prevent sharing in that estate, Bankruptcy Act, § 57, sub. n, 11 U.S.C. § 93, sub. n, yet -the personal liability of the taxpayer remains and is not affected by a discharge, Bankruptcy Act, § 17, sub. a, 11 U.S.C. § 35, sub. a. The statutory provision is quite explicit and there is no room for •estoppel or other defense. Hence the plaintiff’s claim for income tax refund must fail notwithstanding his discharge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Menick v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Salsbury Motors, Inc. v. United States Goggin v. Salsbury Motors, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Newberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spring Hill Nurseries Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Grynberg v. United States (In Re Grynberg)District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  3. Brints v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  4. King v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  5. King v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API