Coleman & Stahl v. Weimer

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is a scire facias upon a judgment over twenty years old. The facts need not be repeated now because they were stated fully when the case was here before at April Term, 1924: 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 252. At that time we reversed and awarded a new trial for the sole reason that the trial judge admitted certain incompetent evidence offered by defendant for the purpose of rebutting plaintiffs’ testimony that the judgment was not paid. Defendant again has a verdict and plaintiffs have appealed.

The first assignment of error complains of the refusal of the trial judge to…