Linkous v. National Bank of Georgia
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Undercofler, Justice.
In this case, we are called upon to examine the validity of an “in terrorem” clause forbidding any challenge to a will under penalty of forfeiture. Such clauses are permitted by statute, Code Ann. § 113-820, but are not favored in the law and, like all restrictions, must be strictly construed, Boykin v. Bradley, 192 Ga. 212 (14 SE2d 734) (1941). The trial court held the clause in this will invalid. We affirm.
National Bank of Georgia, as executor and trustee under the will of Nelson T. Levings, filed its petition for a declaratory judgment as to certain aspects of the will…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lanier v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Taylor v. RappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Broach v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Boykin v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Preuss v. STOKES PREUSSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Callaway v. WillardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Cox v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Cox v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Linkous v. National Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.