Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Leavitt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1852PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The question is presented in this case, simply and nakedly; whether a voluntary assignment by a debtor in failing circumstances is void -by reason of its containing a clause authorizing the assignee to sell the assigned property on credit.

I should be inclined to consider the decision of the supreme court in Burdick v. Hunting (MS.), and the ruling of this court in Barney v. Griffen (2 Comst., 371), as decisive of the question. I have no means of going behind the report of these cases, to inquire into the private opinion of the members of the court, and if I had, I should be reluctant to do…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gates v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Gates v. AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API