Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Herring

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1984No. 834SC416PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

The test for directing a verdict for a defendant on the ground of contributory negligence is easily stated. Such a motion should only be granted when “the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, establishes plaintiffs contributory negligence so clearly that no other reasonable inference or conclusion may be drawn therefrom.” Meeks v. Atkeson, 7 N.C. App. 631, 636, 173 S.E. 2d 509, 512 (1970), quoting Brown v. Hale, 263 N.C. 176, 139 S.E. 2d 210 (1964). Although readily stated, the application of this rule to fact situations like the instant one…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Williams v. Frederickson Motor Express Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Cummins v. Southern Fruit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Warren v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alston v. HerrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. LaFalce v. WolcottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Alston v. HerrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Dunn v. HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. LyonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API