Legal Opinion

Associated Mills, Inc. v. Rush-Hampton Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 15, 1984No. 84C 3052PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Associated Mills, Inc. (“Associated Mills”) has filed a multi-count Complaint against Rush-Hampton Industries, Inc. (“Rush-Hampton”):

1. Count I is brought under the Lanham Act, charging infringement of Associated Mills’ federally-registered “Pollenex” trademarks.

2. Count II asserts the federal version of commonlaw unfair competition under Lanham Act § 43(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

3. Count III (asserting both diversity of citizenship and pendent jurisdiction) charges unfair competition and deceptive trade practices.

Rush-Hampton has both answered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Von Holdt v. Husky Injection Molding Systems, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. Medi USA, L.P. v. Jobst Institute, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. Bianco v. Texas Instruments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Espino v. Top Draw Freight System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Letter-Rite, Inc. v. Computer Talk, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API