People ex rel. Ross v. Dooling
New York Supreme Court
Motion for a writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
Upon the trial of the issues presented by the alternative writ, the question was raised whether, on the evidence most favorable to the relator, he had not waived his right to written charges and a hearing. The matter was submitted to the jury with the understanding that the court would take briefs from counsel upon this point of law and, if such was the position of the relator under the authorities, the verdict would be set aside. The whole question turns upon the duty of the relator to make known his right, under section 21 of the Civil Service Law, when he knows that his, removal is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Stutzbach v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People Ex Rel. Robesch v. President of Borough of QueensNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- People ex rel. McDonald v. ClausenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Glennon v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Levy v. Grove Mills Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Castel v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- People ex rel. Ross v. DoolingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909