Legal Opinion

Michigan Loan Ass'n v. Cahill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 121, Calendar No. 35,430PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This is an action on a promissory note for $1,850 payable in three and a half years with interest at seven per cent.

The plaintiff is licensed to conduct what is called a small loan business under Act No. 317, Pub. Acts 1921, as amended by Act No. 181, Pub. Acts 1925 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 12198 et seq.). The defendant Edward J. Cahill, Jr., was engaged in the automobile business. He was financed by the plaintiff in various transactions, three of which are connected with the note in suit. In the first transaction, the plaintiff loaned him $300 and took Ms note for that amount bearing interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Smith v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Carr v. TaylorAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bookhout v. McGeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Wagner v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Daenzer v. Wayland Ford, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Kansas City Life Insurance v. DurantMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Leon v. ZlatkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API