Hills & Co. v. Hoover
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; James B. Holland, Judge. Action by Hills & Company, Limited, against Joseph Hoover and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
The present is one of a number of cases growing out of the alleged violation by Joseph Ploover et al., the defendants, of the copyright of Hills & Co., Limited, the plaintiff, to certain engravings. The original cas.e in this circuit—for one phase of the controversy was involved in Hills v. Austrich (C. C.) 120 Fed. 862 (1903), a case in the Second circuit—was an action of replevin brought by the plaintiff against the defendant in the Circuit Court to-recover 20,000 copies of the offending copyright engravings. The marshal found and seized 4,673 copies in defendants’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilhelm's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Hills & Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bolles v. Outing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Hills & Co. v. HooverU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906
- Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ibach v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1934