Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Dunn

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris Marshall Cohn, J.

This is an action for the conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death of the infant, Harold R. Aiken, who was struck by the automobile of the defendant. Following the submission of the case to the jury and after deliberation for several hours, the jury returned to the courtroom for instructions. The foreman held up what appeared to be a small book and during the course of his remarks to the court, the record indicates that the following occurred:

*216‘ ‘ The Court: The attendant tells me you have an inquiry you wish to make.

“ The Foreman: Yes, sir, we have a question in mind. We have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Public Operating Corp. v. WeingartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Guntzer v. HealyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. BillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Billman v. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API