Legal Opinion

In Re Support of Pearson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1986No. 61954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Plaintiff, Pauline Pearson, instituted the present action asking that defendant, her former husband, Robert Pearson, contribute toward the educational expenses of their son, Keith. The circuit court of Cook County ordered that defendant pay $100 per month for two years toward Keith’s post-high-school education. Plaintiff appealed, and the appellate court, in a Rule 23 order (87 Ill. 2d R. 23), modified the judgment to require defendant to pay $5,150 per year for two years (132 Ill. App. 3d 1159). This court granted defendant’s petition for leave to appeal.

The sole issue presented is whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kujawinski v. KujawinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Elizer v. ElizerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Greiman v. FriedmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of GardnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Booth v. BoothAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blisset v. BlissetIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In re Marriage of DivarcoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. PEOPLE EX REL. SUSSEN v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. In Re Marriage of PearsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. In re Parentage of M.M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API