Legal Opinion
Brodsky v. The New York City Campaign Finance Board
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 12, 2025No. 1:24-cv-02823Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MERYL BRODSKY, Plaintiff, 24 Civ. 2823 (PAE) (GS) -\V- OPINION & ORDER THE NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD et al, Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On April 15, 2024, plaintiff Meryl Brodsky, pro se, filed this action against defendants New York City Campaign Finance Board (the “Board”) and Muriel Goode-Trufant, Acting New York City Corporation Counsel (the “Corporation Counsel”). Dkt. 1 (“Complaint”); Dkt. 14 (“Amended Complaint” or “AC”). Brodsky centrally seeks damages arising from the Board’s garnishment of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- TechnoMarine SA v. Giftports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- McLeod v. the Jewish Guild for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.