Legal Opinion

Cardiota v. Cunningham Piano Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1925No. Appeal 359PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The Cunningham Piano Co. is engaged in the business of selling pianos, and repairing and tuning such instruments, as an incident of the business. Anthony Cardiota, the deceased husband of the plaintiff, had been employed by the piano company, as a tuner, repairman and salesman for many years when, on July 18, 1923, he was killed by the up-setting of his automobile bn a highway in Bucks County. The store of the piano company is located at 1101 Chestnut St., Philadelphia. The widow, this plaintiff, presented a petition to the Workmen’s Compensation Board, averring that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodman v. SmedleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Zelazny v. Seneca Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Yodis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Leinbach Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Lenhart v. Emmons & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. A. Kolasa v. B. StubnickieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Mooney v. Julius WeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API