Legal Opinion

Lund v. Davies

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Freeborn county, Fanner, J., presiding, affirming a justice’s judgment of $26.59, from which defendant had appealed on questions of law alone.

1Opinion of the CourtDicKINson, J.

While the evidence as returned, upon which the plaintiffs recovered judgment in a justice’s court, was meagre, it was sufficient to justify the conclusion that the defendant came to the plaintiff C. A. Lund, (who is the husband of the other plaintiff,) in ■company with the deputy sheriff, to collect or enforce a judgment which had been recovered against Lund, concerning the amount of which Lund was ignorant; that the defendant falsely and fraudulently represented that the judgment amounted to about $100, but that he would “settle it” for $85, while in fact the judgment was muchless than the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benson v. United States Instalment Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Dwinnell v. OftedahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Call v. Terminal Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API