Legal Opinion

State v. Figueroa

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 26, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

919 A.2d 826 (2007)

190 N.J. 219

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Robert A. FIGUEROA, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 30, 2007.

Decided April 26, 2007.

Sara B. Liebman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Theodore J. Romankow, Union County Prosecutor, attorney; Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Anthony J. Pope, Jr., Newark, argued the cause for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · HoensJustice Hoens

In 1980, we announced guidelines to govern trial courts faced with the questions of whether and how to direct juries that had reported themselves…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API