Legal Opinion
Chavez v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 30, 2004No. 02-56789; D.C. No. CV-00-08251-NMMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
1
The district court properly granted summary judgment on Chavez’s hostile work environment claim under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Chavez, the instances of alleged harassment were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of his employment. See Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 786-88, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998); Manatt v. Bank of America, NA, 339 F.3d 792, 798-99 (9th Cir.2003).
2
The district court properly granted summary judgment on the Chavezes’ 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Andrew G. YARTZOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lee M. THOMAS, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.