Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hickmott

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 8, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cribb, S.

This is a proceeding brought by the petitioner, James W. Hornsby, whereby he seeks an adjudication declaring him to be the owner of a certain bank account and entitled to possession of the pass book issued thereon and now in the possession of the executrix, deposited in the Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company in his name and that of the decedent, Hatty Hickmott, “ as joint tenants, payable to either or the survivor.” The executrix and Rose Gilman, sole beneficiary under decedent’s will, filed an answer.

The decedent, Hattie Hickmott, died testate on the 7th day of December,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Kelly v. . BeersNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Clary v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  4. Brumer v. BrumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. In re the Estate of GarlockNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ebert v. RitcheyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. In re the Estate of DukeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  3. In re the Estate of FischerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API