Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The first issue on this appeal is whether defendant had been seized without probable cause before he made incriminating statements (see, Dunaway v New York, 442 US 200). It is conceded by defendant that initially he voluntarily accompanied the police officers to the station for questioning. He was not arrested, nor was he handcuffed or otherwise restrained before or at the time of his arrival at the station. He accompanied the officers to the interview room, where he was fully advised of his Miranda rights, voluntarily waived those rights, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. RydellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. Bell-ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. People v. SalamoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API