Legal Opinion

Bolling v. Pikeville National Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 2, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Sandidge

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

Appellee, Pikeville National Bank, instituted this suit in the Pike circuit court on thirteen separate notes against appellant, J. M. Bolling and wife, Daisy O. Bolling, and as an incident to the action sued out a general order of attachment against the property of appellants, and in the same action asserted a lien upon the residence of appellants located in Pikeville, to secure note number 13, for $3,400.00. With respect to the $3,400.00 the bank alleged that the money “went into the purchase of the house and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. Proctor's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Proudley v. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Huckabee v. Black Mountain Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Thacker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  4. Glass v. Alcorn, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Bunn v. McAdams, Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API