Legal Opinion
Temple v. Russell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 24, 1925PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a petition by the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Emeline M. Evans, for instructions as to the disposition of the proceeds of sale of certain real estate and of a savings bank deposit which his testatrix, without professional assistance, in a holographic will devised and bequeathed as follows: ‘' First: — To Austin E. Russell, of said Medford, Massachusetts, who for long years has been our constant and devoted friend, in recognition of such faithful devotion, I give, devise and bequeath *234my estate, .at No. 20 Brooks Park, in said Medford, Massachusetts, together…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Metcalf v. First Parish in FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Eustace v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Ware v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Crapo v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Hess v. SinglerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Salsman v. National Community Bank of RutherfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Anderson v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Cooney v. MontanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Central RR Co. v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.