Higgins v. Mossler Acceptance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This general statement, adopted by the appellee,. as qualified by “explanatory and supplementary statements in clarification thereof”, is taken from the appellant’s brief: “This is a suit by the appellant against the Mossier Acceptance Company to recover double the amount of usurious interest alleged to have been paid by the appellant to the appellee in the aggregate sum of $437.36, less the sum of $40.16, the balance due on the principal sum borrowed from the appellee with which to purchase *533an automobile from the Harlan Hodges Motor Company, and further to recover the sum of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
- Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. TodTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Parks, Administrator v. LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Galveston & Houston Investment Co. v. GrymesTexas Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. NesmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Olshan Lumber Company v. BullardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- McDonald v. DEBCO CORPORATION OF TEXASCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Laird v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948