Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bank of Tallapoosa

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1924No. 14814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Only the second headnote needs , to be enlarged upon. On the trial of the case the defendant swore in part as follows: “When the exchange was made of these two notes I did not indorse the note I am now sued on. Nothing was said about me indorsing it. Later on, Mr. Davis, as such cashier of the bank, asked me to indorse the note I had exchanged to the bank, he saying the bank could not enter suit against the Browns unless I did indorse the note, to make the title of the bank complete. I first refused to indorse it, but Mr. Davis, the cashier, told me that I…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swindell & Co. v. Bainbridge State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Goette v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Haymans v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Proctor v. Royster Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Jossey v. RushinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoffman v. Louis L. Battey PostCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API